Tipsy coachman doctrine
WebJun 15, 2024 · However, because the trial court came to the correct conclusion that there was no waiver, we affirm under the ‘tipsy coachman doctrine.’ See, e.g., Robertson v. State , 829 So. 2d 901, 906 (Fla. 2002) (noting that the doctrine allows an appellate court to affirm a trial court's decision that reaches the correct result for the wrong reasons ... WebAug 3, 2024 · The Tipsy Coachman Doctrine – Right for the Wrong Reason. If a trial court’s decision is right for the wrong reason, it may be affirmed on appeal if there is any theory …
Tipsy coachman doctrine
Did you know?
WebFeb 11, 2014 · The “tipsy coachman” doctrine By Eugene Volokh February 11, 2014 at 11:47 a.m. EST The term is mostly used in Florida cases, though it has also been mentioned in … WebSep 8, 2010 · Under the tipsy coachman doctrine, where the trial court "reaches the right result, but for the wrong reasons," an appellate court can affirm the decision only if "there is any theory or principle of law in the record which would support the ruling."
WebJun 7, 2024 · The Carroll Doctrine: Setting the Stage for Warrant-less Searches. This case took place during the prohibition era, when alcohol was illegal. In this case, police were … WebMay 25, 2024 · In a very brief opinion, the appellate court stated that it was affirming based on the “tipsy coachman doctrine.” Pursuant to that doctrine, "even though a trial court’s ruling is based on improper reasoning, the ruling will be upheld if there is any theory or principle of law in the record which would support the ruling.”
WebThe Tipsy Coachman doctrine is a rule of law that upholds in a higher court a correct conclusion, despite flawed reasoning by the judge in a lower court. In other words, the … WebFeb 16, 2024 · The term “tipsy coachman” comes from Carraway v. Armour and Co., 156 So. 2d 494 Fla. 1963, in which the Florida Supreme Court determined that a deputy …
WebThis Court did not deal with the tipsy coachman doctrine in detail but instead cited two cases on the subject and provided a quotation in footnote 3 from . Robertson v. State, 829 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 2002). The Fourth District was clearly instructed to follow this Court's case law on the Tipsy Coachman Doctrine as stated in Robertson.
WebNov 21, 2016 · The tipsy coachman doctrine—which only applies to support affirmance, not as a basis for reversal—allows an appellee to argue for affirmance on grounds other than … swaledale mountain rescue facebookWebAs a practical matter, these issues are often conflated with the Tipsy Coachman Doctrine, which is a judicial rule dealing with matters of law alone. These older rules governing the scope of appellate review are often helpful in determining whether the application of the Tipsy Coachman Doctrine is necessary at all. Jack E. Holt III, Maitland skilled nursing facilities joplin moWebJul 7, 2007 · The tipsy coachman or "dead man's" doctrine is a firmly established appellate doctrine in Florida (18) although, when adopted from Georgia, the doctrine was already a settled rule of Florida jurisprudence, but just not named the "tipsy coachman." (19) Thus, finally named, the doctrine became real. swaledale north yorkshireWebin Appeal In a previous article, I discussed the appellate doctrine known as the tipsy coachman doctrine, which stands for the principle that an appellate court can affirm a trial court even if the trial court reached the right result … swaledale mountain bike routesWebSep 8, 2010 · Under the tipsy coachman doctrine, where the trial court “reaches the right result, but for the wrong reasons,” an appellate court can affirm the decision only if “there is any theory or principle of law in the record which would support the ruling.” swaledale music festivalWebAug 1, 2013 · The tipsy coachman doctrine allows appellate courts to consider grounds for affirmance if the record supports doing so; it does not compel them to overlook deficient records and blaze new trails that even the tipsiest of coachmen could not have traversed. swaledale public libraryWebTools A legal doctrine is a framework, set of rules, procedural steps, or test, often established through precedent in the common law, through which judgments can be … swaledale reclaimed roofing supplies